github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix array_repeat scalar path overflows total repeated-value count [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix array_repeat scalar path overflows total repeated-value count [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: align regexp_instr empty pattern [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fixed blocks in aggregation state for better memory management [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary large allocations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary large allocations [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(ci): Drop Windows CI runs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): Drop Windows CI runs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): Drop Windows CI runs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] PushDownLeafProjections error with Unnest nodes [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: make PushDownLeafProjections work with unnest [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Be able to cast struct to have non-nullable inner field [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Be able to cast struct to have non-nullable inner field [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] perf(optimizer): EliminateCrossJoin walks the full plan tree even when there are no joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Full lambda support [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Boolean in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ffi): plumb `simplify`, `expressions`, `reverse_expr`, and `documentation` through `FFI_WindowUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Support multiple external table locations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Incompatibility] Verify array_contains null handling matches Spark [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test: add array_contains null semantics coverage [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] bench: add predicate_eval SQL micro-benchmark suite for conjunctive filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: add predicate_eval SQL micro-benchmark suite for conjunctive filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: add predicate_eval SQL micro-benchmark suite for conjunctive filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: add predicate_eval SQL micro-benchmark suite for conjunctive filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: add predicate_eval SQL micro-benchmark suite for conjunctive filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: add predicate_eval SQL micro-benchmark suite for conjunctive filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: make_array accepts inputs differing only in nested-field nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: make_array accepts inputs differing only in nested-field nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): EliminateCrossJoin fast-path for join-free plans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): EliminateCrossJoin fast-path for join-free plans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): EliminateCrossJoin fast-path for join-free plans [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Added support AUTO REFRESH in CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW for redshift [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages