adriangb commented on PR #21929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/21929#issuecomment-4471390451

   Thanks so much @timsaucer !
   
   > LMK if you want me to take another look since you did another push since I 
reviewed
   
   It's the same content, I was just re-organizing the commits to make it 
easier to review 😄. I think it would be good for @alamb to take a look at this, 
especially since we can wait to ship it until after 54 has been released (so no 
big rush).
   
   > I found the description to have the answers I was looking for eventually, 
but the llm generated text had so much content I didn't want to read it all 
just to understand what is actually not a very complex refactor. This held me 
up more than anything. It would have been more helpful to have a more pithy 
description that got me right to the useful pieces.
   
   > I'm finding for my own PRs that I need to make a lot of edits to these 
generated descriptions because they're not always great at isolating what a 
reviewer really needs to understand vs cataloging all the work that was done.
   
   Sorry about this. I agree with you. I usually leave the LLM generated 
descriptions up for draft PRs or where they are "fine" and better than "I'm a 
lazy human so really didn't write much at all" but I do try to rewrite them 
where it would be helpful (e.g. incidentally I was *just* rewriting the one in 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/22300 by hand while you were 
reviewing this). Just bad timing / judgment on this one. I'll update it for the 
next reviewer and note the feedback.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to