4ktLuffy commented on issue #23410:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/23410#issuecomment-5239310787

   I can't reproduce this on `main` @ `308e212` — both DataFusion and 
PostgreSQL 14 return an empty result for the query as written.
   
   I checked four ways:
   
   1. **The exact reproduction above** (in-memory tables) — empty.
   2. **Ten variants around it** — filter placed before vs. after the subquery, 
a literal `a NOT IN (1, NULL)` list, a subquery mixing NULL and non-NULL 
values, a correlated subquery, and `(a != 1 OR a IS NULL)`. All ten match 
PostgreSQL exactly.
   3. **Execution settings** — `target_partitions` at 1, 8 and 32, plus 
`filter_null_join_keys = true` and `repartition_joins = false`. All empty. (I 
checked partition counts because #5082 showed `pg_compat_window.slt` behaving 
differently at `target_partitions >= 32`.)
   4. **CSV-backed external tables**, 200 rows, with the fixture asserted to 
contain exactly one NULL row — 0 rows.
   
   The plan does still push the filter beneath the null-aware anti join, which 
I believe is the shape flagged in the report:
   
   ```
   logical_plan
   01)Projection: t.id
   02)--LeftAnti Join: t.a = __correlated_sq_1.k null_aware
   03)----Filter: t.a != Int32(1)
   04)------TableScan: t projection=[id, a]
   05)----SubqueryAlias: __correlated_sq_1
   06)------TableScan: u projection=[k]
   ```
   
   I couldn't find a PR referencing this issue, so I don't know what changed in 
between. Is there context missing from the reproduction — a specific version, 
or a table provider other than in-memory? Happy to re-test if so.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to