github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump syn from 2.0.103 to 2.0.104 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.6 faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.6 faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.4X faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.4X faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.4X faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.4X faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.4X faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.4X faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray (1.4X faster for sort-tpch Q11) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Perf Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Perf Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Perf: Optimize CursorValues compare performance for StringViewArray [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: extend recursive protection to prevent stack overflows in additional functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Feat/sample [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support table sample [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support table sample [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support table sample [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support table sample [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support table sample [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support table sample [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support table sample [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: supports array_distinct [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: SortMergeJoin for timestamp keys [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: SortMergeJoin for timestamp keys [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: SortMergeJoin for timestamp keys [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: SortMergeJoin for timestamp keys [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: SortMergeJoin for timestamp keys [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: SortMergeJoin for timestamp keys [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support Null aware anti join by HashJoin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support Null aware anti join by HashJoin [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Chore: implement predicate exprs as ScalarUDFImpl [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Chore: implement predicate exprs as ScalarUDFImpl [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Chore: implement predicate exprs as ScalarUDFImpl [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Chore: implement predicate exprs as ScalarUDFImpl [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Dataframe doesn't properly implement ArrowStream export interface [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dataframe doesn't properly implement ArrowStream export interface [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dataframe doesn't properly implement ArrowStream export interface [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for Arrow Duration type in Substrait [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add a case for reading map_entries in the `read basic complex types` test [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add a case for reading map_entries in the `read basic complex types` test [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] datafusion-cli: Use correct S3 region if it is not specified [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] datafusion-cli: Use correct S3 region if it is not specified [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] datafusion-cli: Use correct S3 region if it is not specified [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] datafusion-cli: Use correct S3 region if it is not specified [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] datafusion-cli: Use correct S3 region if it is not specified [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] datafusion-cli: Use correct S3 region if it is not specified [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Alamb/revert fix [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] restore topk pre-filtering of batches and make sort query fuzzer less sensitive to expected non determinism [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] restore topk pre-filtering of batches and make sort query fuzzer less sensitive to expected non determinism [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore topk filtering tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] restore topk pre-filtering of batches and make sort query fuzzer less sensitive to expected non determinism [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add support for LANGUAGE clause in CREATE PROCEDURE [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for LANGUAGE clause in CREATE PROCEDURE [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] Improving support for `CREATE PROCEDURE` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] Support procedure argmode [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support procedure argmode [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support procedure argmode [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: refactor `BuildProbeJoinMetrics` to use `BaselineMetrics` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump prost-types from 0.13.5 to 0.14.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Add overflow check for SumDecimalGroupsAccumulator::evaluate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add overflow check for SumDecimalGroupsAccumulator::evaluate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add overflow check for SumDecimalGroupsAccumulator::evaluate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add overflow check for SumDecimalGroupsAccumulator::evaluate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add overflow check for SumDecimalGroupsAccumulator::evaluate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add overflow check for SumDecimalGroupsAccumulator::evaluate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add overflow check for SumDecimalGroupsAccumulator::evaluate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add overflow check to evaluate of sum decimal accumulator [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump prost from 0.13.5 to 0.14.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add Iceberg documentation to website [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support `DESC <table>` statement [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `DESC <table>` statement [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Implement ToPrettyString [wip] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Implement ToPrettyString [wip] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Implement ToPrettyString [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Implement ToPrettyString [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Implement ToPrettyString [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Implement ToPrettyString [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump prost from 0.13.5 to 0.14.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump prost from 0.13.5 to 0.14.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump mimalloc from 0.1.46 to 0.1.47 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump prost-types from 0.13.5 to 0.14.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump prost-types from 0.13.5 to 0.14.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add statistics to ParquetExec for *files* pruned [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add statistics to ParquetExec for *files* pruned [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add statistics to ParquetExec for *files* pruned [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add statistics to ParquetExec for *files* pruned [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] ListingTable and FileScanConfig assume all files accessible via single ObjectStore instance [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor reassign_predicate_columns to accept an &Schema instead of &Arc<Schema> [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor reassign_predicate_columns to accept an &Schema instead of &Arc<Schema> [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] use 'lit' as the field name for literal values [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] use 'lit' as the field name for literal values [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] use 'lit' as the field name for literal values [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] use 'lit' as the field name for literal values [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] use 'lit' as the field name for literal values [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add an example of embedding indexes *inside* a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an example of embedding indexes *inside* a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an example of embedding indexes *inside* a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an example of embedding indexes *inside* a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an example of embedding indexes *inside* a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an example of embedding indexes *inside* a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an example of embedding indexes *inside* a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an example of embedding indexes *inside* a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages