github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Fix NULL Arithmetic Handling for Numerical Operators in Type Coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Unexpected "type mismatch" when filtering bool list column using `array_distinct` and `make_array` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] support `regexp_match` as predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Make Parquet EncryptionFactory async [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Make Parquet EncryptionFactory async [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Make Parquet EncryptionFactory async [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] re-export physical_expr_adapter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] re-export physical_expr_adapter [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Memory datasource protobuf support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Memory datasource protobuf support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Memory datasource protobuf support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Memory datasource protobuf support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Memory datasource protobuf support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Memory datasource protobuf support [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Collect all fallback reasons in logs of spark sql unit tests [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Collect all fallback reasons in logs of spark sql unit tests [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Fix regression in NativeConfigSuite [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fix regression in NativeConfigSuite [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fix regression in NativeConfigSuite [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fix regression in NativeConfigSuite [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Expose hash to FFI udf/udaf/udwf to fix their Eq [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/setup-python from 5.6.0 to 6.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/setup-python from 5.6.0 to 6.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix syntax error in DDL documentation example [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix syntax error in DDL documentation example [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Export symbols from datafusion-physical-expr-adapter to the top level datafusion / core namespace [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Export symbols from datafusion-physical-expr-adapter to the top level datafusion / core namespace [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Use return_field instead of return_type for calling aggregates via FFI [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use return_field instead of return_type for calling aggregates via FFI [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use return_field instead of return_type for calling aggregates via FFI [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `change_redundant_column` lossy approach breaks logical optimizer and physical planner [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic filters blog post (rev 2) [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• Re: [I] September 2025 ASF Board Report [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] September 2025 ASF Board Report [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] September 2025 ASF Board Report [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] September 2025 ASF Board Report [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: UnnestExec preserves relevant equivalence properties of input [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: UnnestExec preserves relevant equivalence properties of input [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: UnnestExec preserves relevant equivalence properties of input [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: UnnestExec preserves relevant equivalence properties of input [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: UnnestExec preserves relevant equivalence properties of input [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: return ALL constants in `EquivalenceProperties::constants` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return ALL constants in `EquivalenceProperties::constants` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return ALL constants in `EquivalenceProperties::constants` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return ALL constants in `EquivalenceProperties::constants` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return ALL constants in `EquivalenceProperties::constants` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return ALL constants in `EquivalenceProperties::constants` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return ALL constants in `EquivalenceProperties::constants` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return ALL constants in `EquivalenceProperties::constants` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `50.0.0` (Aug/Sep 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Benchmark window function with multiple partitioning columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Benchmark window function with multiple partitioning columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Benchmark window function with multiple partitioning columns [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Long planning time when window function is partitioned by multiple columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Exponential planning time when window function is partitioned by multiple columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Exponential planning time when window function is partitioned by multiple columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Exponential planning time when window function is partitioned by multiple columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Exponential planning time when window function is partitioned by multiple columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Exponential planning time when window function is partitioned by multiple columns [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Improve `EXPLAN` command support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Support distributed plan in `EXPLAIN` command [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support distributed plan in `EXPLAIN` command [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support distributed plan in `EXPLAIN` command [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support distributed plan in `EXPLAIN` command [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support distributed plan in `EXPLAIN` command [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support distributed plan in `EXPLAIN` command [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Ignore fallback info for command execs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Ignore fallback info for command execs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Ignore fallback info for command execs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Ignore fallback info for command execs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] support filter pushdown with left-semi joins in HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] support filter pushdown with left-semi joins in HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Use a struct for ProjectionExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a struct for ProjectionExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a struct for ProjectionExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a struct for ProjectionExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Respect native features env for cargo commands [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Respect native features env for cargo commands [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DataFusionError instead of ArrowError in FileOpenFuture [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] add a ci job for typo checking [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add a ci job for typo checking [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Access to selected scan implementation [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Access to selected scan implementation [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Access to selected scan implementation [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Update benchmarking scripts [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Update benchmarking scripts [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Update benchmarking scripts [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] support FFI query result streams that do not pre-collect [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [I] Remove pyarrow as required dependency, relying on Arrow PyCapsule Interface [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove pyarrow as required dependency, relying on Arrow PyCapsule Interface [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove pyarrow as required dependency, relying on Arrow PyCapsule Interface [datafusion-python] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages