github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: add `register_metadata` function for `GroupsAccumulator` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `register_metadata` function for `GroupsAccumulator` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] CLI query result header for cast expressions with literals is confusing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CLI query result header for cast expressions with literals is confusing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CLI query result header for cast expressions with literals is confusing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CLI query result header for cast expressions with literals is confusing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CLI query result header for cast expressions with literals is confusing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CLI query result header for cast expressions with literals is confusing [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix STRAIGHT_JOIN not in RESERVED_FOR_TABLE_ALIAS [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix STRAIGHT_JOIN not in RESERVED_FOR_TABLE_ALIAS [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix STRAIGHT_JOIN not in RESERVED_FOR_TABLE_ALIAS [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `STRAIGHT_JOIN` constraint when table alias is absent [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor regexp slt tests [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Re-enable tests for FIRS/LAST [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for datafusion 47.0.0 and arrow-rs 55.0.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for datafusion 47.0.0 and arrow-rs 55.0.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for datafusion 47.0.0 and arrow-rs 55.0.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for datafusion 47.0.0 and arrow-rs 55.0.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support min/max for struct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support min/max for struct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support min/max for struct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support min/max for struct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support min/max for struct [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] doc/document options clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] doc/document options clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] doc/document options clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] doc/document options clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] doc/document options clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve documentation for format `OPTIONS` clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve documentation for format `OPTIONS` clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve documentation for format `OPTIONS` clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve documentation for format `OPTIONS` clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve documentation for format `OPTIONS` clause [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Upgrade guide for DataFusion 47.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Upgrade guide for DataFusion 47.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] OOM when nested join + limit [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Make tree the Default EXPLAIN Format and Reorder Documentation Sections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make tree the Default EXPLAIN Format and Reorder Documentation Sections [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: fix workflow triggering extended tests from pr comments. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: fix workflow triggering extended tests from pr comments. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: fix workflow triggering extended tests from pr comments. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: fix workflow triggering extended tests from pr comments. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: fix workflow triggering extended tests from pr comments. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: fix workflow triggering extended tests from pr comments. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: fix workflow triggering extended tests from pr comments. [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump flate2 from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump flate2 from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: only refresh the minimum sysinfo in mem limit tests. [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add dynamic pruning filters from TopK state [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix: after repartitioning, the `PartitionedFile` and `FileGroup` statistics should be inexact/recomputed [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Update regexp slt tests to refactor out string type tests, cleanup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update regexp slt tests to refactor out string type tests, cleanup [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] WIP: Attach Diagnostic to syntax errors [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Optimize TopK with filter [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] chore: Move Map branches to separate file [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] GlobalLimitExec execution offset pagination query results in internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] GlobalLimitExec execution offset pagination query results in internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] GlobalLimitExec execution offset pagination query results in internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] GlobalLimitExec execution offset pagination query results in internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] GlobalLimitExec execution offset pagination query results in internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] chore: Improve crates.io download stability [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Override MapBuilder values field with expected schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Override MapBuilder values field with expected schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Override MapBuilder values field with expected schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Override MapBuilder values field with expected schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Override MapBuilder values field with expected schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Override MapBuilder values field with expected schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Override MapBuilder values field with expected schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Filter multiple columns from TopK using Lexicographical ordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filter multiple columns from TopK using Lexicographical ordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filter multiple columns from TopK using Lexicographical ordering [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Add ConfigOptions to ScalarFunctionArgs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add ConfigOptions to ScalarFunctionArgs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add ConfigOptions to ScalarFunctionArgs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add ConfigOptions to ScalarFunctionArgs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] extendable task distribution api [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] pluggable task distribution policies [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] Question: is there a way to get the current catalog or database? [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Question: is there a way to get the current catalog or database? [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Question: is there a way to get the current catalog or database? [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Question: is there a way to get the current catalog or database? [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Per file filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Per file filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Per file filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Per file filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Per file filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Per file filter evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Improve the way to pass through configurations to datafusion [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] starts_with function is serialised as UDF [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] starts_with function is serialised as UDF [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove `flight-sql` from ballista in 46.0.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove `flight-sql` from ballista in 46.0.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] add create_dataframe method to BallistaContest [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add create_dataframe method to BallistaContest [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Deployment on AWS [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Deployment on AWS [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add S3 object store support to executor and scheduler [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add S3 object store support to executor and scheduler [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add S3 object store support to executor and scheduler [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [D] San Francisco DataFusion Meetup scheduled for 9/25 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] San Francisco DataFusion Meetup scheduled for 9/25 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Anyone around for the Databricks Data & AI Summit in San Francisco June 9–12? [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize TopK with filter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with filter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with filter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with filter ~1.4x faster [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with filter ~1.4x faster [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with filter ~1.4x faster [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with filter ~1.4x faster [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with filter ~1.4x faster [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x speedup [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support Rust UDF [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Rust UDF [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Emit warning with Diagnostic when doing = Null [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Minor: add order by arg for last value [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor: add order by arg for last value [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages