GitHub user LDM-A added a comment to the discussion: Policy on uptick of LLM PRs from new contributors
Although this doesn't directly solve the problem for people who want to attempt to leverage usage of LLMs to spam PRs everywhere and only get a few reviewed, but both ghostyy (less good imo) or bevy (more intresting). Have I think found intresting solutions to try out or adapt pieces of. Ghostyy (https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) I think there is some other strain here for maintainers to read vouch requests, although this scales down the amount of work vs PR reviews significantly. For Bevy (https://bevy.org/learn/contribute/helping-out/opening-pull-requests/) most notably I'm refering to step 2 here "Other community members review and comment in an ad-hoc fashion.". I process this as make the community itself do the first steps of reviewing before it is handed over to someone who can get it merged in aka most of you guys. This obviously has a training problem of getting people comfortable to do reviews, but if it's one of the few ways for non committ ers to get their PRs merged, I think they will go and try to review other people's code in the hope theirs gets reviewed too. Also having the side effect that trying to review a PR is a surprisingly good way to learn a codebase. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/discussions/24413#discussioncomment-18047540 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
