github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Join fuzz [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix extended tests failure on main by updating `datafusion-testing` pin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix extended tests failure on main by updating `datafusion-testing` pin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix extended tests failure on main by updating `datafusion-testing` pin [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: Add comprehensive Arrow FFI memory safety analysis [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add Arrow FFI documentation [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [branch-49] Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr (#17123) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Backport Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr (#17123) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Backport Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr (#17123) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Branch 49 17011 patch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Branch 49 17011 patch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Branch 49 17011 patch [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support data source sampling with TABLESAMPLE [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support data source sampling with TABLESAMPLE [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support data source sampling with TABLESAMPLE [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support old syntax for `approx_percentile_cont` and `approx_percentile_cont_with_weight` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Push down entire hash table from HashJoinExec into scans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push down entire hash table from HashJoinExec into scans [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Minor: display filter in HashJoin's tree explain [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor: display filter in HashJoin's tree explain [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Simplify `GetFieldFunc`'s display_name`, `schema_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify `GetFieldFunc`'s `display_name`, `schema_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] optimizer panic with certain query(`count(count(x))/y`) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] optimizer panic with certain query(`count(count(x))/y`) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] optimizer panic with certain query(`count(count(x))/y`) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] optimizer panic with certain query(`count(count(x))/y`) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Implement AggregateUDFImpl::reverse_expr for StringAgg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Implement AggregateUDFImpl::reverse_expr for StringAgg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Implement AggregateUDFImpl::reverse_expr for StringAgg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Implement AggregateUDFImpl::reverse_expr for StringAgg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Implement AggregateUDFImpl::reverse_expr for StringAgg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Implement AggregateUDFImpl::reverse_expr for StringAgg [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Error reading parquet files on S3 using native_iceberg_compat reader when the path contains URL-encode escape sequences [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Error reading parquet files on S3 using native_iceberg_compat reader when the path contains URL-encode escape sequences [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Fix repeatedly url-decode path when reading parquet from s3 using native parquet reader [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fix repeatedly url-decode path when reading parquet from s3 using native parquet reader [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fix repeatedly url-decode path when reading parquet from s3 using native parquet reader [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fix repeatedly url-decode path when reading parquet from s3 using native parquet reader [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fix repeatedly url-decode path when reading parquet from s3 using native parquet reader [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Blog: Limit max width [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Blog: Limit max width [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• [PR] Derive `ScalarUDFImpl` equality, hash from `Eq`, `Hash` traits [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Derive `ScalarUDFImpl` equality, hash from `Eq`, `Hash` traits [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Derive `ScalarUDFImpl` equality, hash from `Eq`, `Hash` traits [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Derive `ScalarUDFImpl` equality, hash from `Eq`, `Hash` traits [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite Nested Loop Join executor for 5× speed and 1% memory usage [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): Update sqlparser to 0.56 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): Update sqlparser to 0.56 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [Draft] More accurate memory accounting in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] More accurate memory accounting in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] More accurate memory accounting in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Enable ANSI support for arithmetic operations [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Enable ANSI support for arithmetic operations [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: init_ansi_mode_enabled [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: init_ansi_mode_enabled [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: init_ansi_mode_enabled [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement_ansi_eval_mode_arithmetic [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Iceberg scan buffer reuse [WIP] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Iceberg scan buffer reuse [WIP] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for adding CopyExec operators to prevent memory corruption from mutable buffer reuse [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Remove emitWarning and add config option to log fallback reasons [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove emitWarning and add config option to log fallback reasons [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Test TopK Dynamic Filter Optimization w/ ORDER BY on multiple columns [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages