korowa opened a new pull request, #12277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12277

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   Closes #12185 .
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   The test output is not deterministic due to absence of sorting and bunch of 
duplicates in input data, and according to the commit 
[history](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/8560/files#diff-302c60bdcb660ff15df18c07385f977c64cfa6aee4c50ea8d1cbd15700ae51b4L167)
 it was not intended to check the output data, but was introduced in order to 
check that timestamp with timezones are not losing timezones while passing 
through query pipeline ([original PR 
link](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/5481)).
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   The test behavior is rolled back to the one before porting to sqllogictests 
-- it now is checking output timestamp type (must contain tz), minimum output 
timestamp value (suppose it may be important) and total count of output records 
(not necessary, but may be helpful in case of debugging potential issues with 
this test).
   
   Test comment also updated as it was suggested in 
[comment](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11939#discussion_r1715517265)
 to previous PR
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to