comphead commented on issue #12363: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/12363#issuecomment-2347023113
Correct, thats what I meant, the difference is how the catalog treats the table, but physically they are the same. If we care about the correct metadata handling in catalog then yes, we need to warn the user that TEMPORARY tables are not supported although they are supported. I believe we can do the same as duckDB having the `temporary` and tweak the catalog based on the flag to comply with standard -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
