OussamaSaoudi opened a new pull request, #12981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12981

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   Closes #12581 
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   This PR allows users to construct `ListingTableUrl` directly with a `Path` 
instead of getting the path by parsing the `Url` path. This is useful when the 
user already has an  `object_store::path::Path`, and doesn't want to convert 
their path to string only for it to be parsed again in `try_new`.
   
   This PR also changes the `impl<P> for DataFilePaths where P: AsRef<str>`. 
Previously, passing a `Vec<ListingTableUrl>` to `read_parquet` would convert 
the `ListingTableUrl` to `&str` and parse it back to `Vec<ListingTableUrl>`.  
This causes issues with escape characters. Instead, I split the trait impl into 
cases for `Vec<&str>` and `Vec<ListingTableUrl>`.
   ## Are these changes tested?
   I add one test to make sure that passing `Vec<ListingTableUrl>` works as 
expected, and does not cause errors due to escape characters.
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to