alamb commented on issue #13274: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13274#issuecomment-2462825550
> One thing thats not clear to me with the FFI approach is who the intended owner of the bindings are - should it be `dft` as i dont want to worry about my deps being on different datafusion versions or is it more for the table providers crates (iceberg, deltalake, hudi, etc)? > > Of course in the short term it could be prototyped in `dft` and contributed back to those repos but im asking more in the target state where the appropriate home would be. The version of DataFusion used in the bindings has to match the client program (`dft` in this case) so I don't think they can go in the delta/iceberg crates One thing we might be able to do is have a separate crate like `datafusion-delta-table-provider` that has different feature flags for different DataFusion versions 🤔 -- but I am now more or less wildly speculating -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
