tbar4 commented on PR #1100:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1100#issuecomment-2477909613

   > I had a quick look at the PR
   > 
   > I think you're overcomplicating it a bit,
   > 
   > if we go back to original idea
   > 
   > ```python
   > from Ballista import Builder
   > ctx : SessionContext = Ballista.builder.config("ballista.job.name","Super 
Cool Ballista Python Job").standalone()
   > ```
   > 
   > you just need `BallistaBuilder` to cover whole flow, no need to introduce 
`SessionConfig` or `SessionState`
   > 
   > ```rust
   > struct BallistaBuilder {
   > confg: HashMap<String,String>
   > }
   > 
   > 
   > impl BallistaBuilder {
   >     fn conf(self, key: String, value: String) -> Self {
   >        self.conf.insert(key, value)
   >        self
   >    }
   > 
   >    fn standalone(self) -> PySessionContext {
   >     // create SessionConfig
   >     // create SessionState
   >    // create SessionContext
   >     PySessionContext { ctx }
   >    }
   > }
   > ```
   > 
   > wdyt @tbar4 ?
   
   Simple enough, though in a future issue I would like to implement the state 
and session config to be on par with the Rust implementation options for 
defining session state and ballista config options


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to