iffyio commented on code in PR #1531:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1531#discussion_r1846910729


##########
src/dialect/mod.rs:
##########
@@ -638,6 +638,11 @@ pub trait Dialect: Debug + Any {
         false
     }
 
+    /// Returns true if the dialect supports the `UNLISTEN` statement
+    fn supports_unlisten(&self) -> bool {
+        false
+    }

Review Comment:
   Oh actually I was initially wondering if it makes sense to reuse the 
existing `supports_listen()` flag for this but then also realised we could 
introduce a `dialect.supports_listen_notify()` to mark the feature itself, 
replacing `dialect.supports_listen()`, `dialect.supports_notify()` and 
`dialect.supports_unlisten()`. Thinking since it would be expected for example 
that a dialect supporting listen should also support notify?



##########
src/dialect/postgresql.rs:
##########
@@ -209,6 +214,11 @@ impl Dialect for PostgreSqlDialect {
     fn supports_comment_on(&self) -> bool {
         true
     }
+
+    /// See <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-load.html>
+    fn supports_load_extension(&self) -> bool {
+        true
+    }

Review Comment:
   Oh, I'm not sure I followed this change, I can see this flag and tests for 
it but there doesn't seem to be any changes to the parser itself?



##########
tests/sqlparser_common.rs:
##########
@@ -11864,6 +11895,56 @@ fn parse_load_data() {
     );
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn test_load_extension() {
+    let dialects = all_dialects_where(|d| d.supports_load_extension());
+    let only_supports_load_data_dialects =
+        all_dialects_where(|d| !d.supports_load_extension() && 
d.supports_load_data());
+    let not_supports_load_dialects =
+        all_dialects_where(|d| !d.supports_load_data() && 
!d.supports_load_extension());

Review Comment:
   given we're only looking to test the load_extension syntax, would it make 
sense to only keep the test scoped to only `all_dialects_where(|d| 
d.supports_load_extension())` in order to keep the test focused?
   Otherwise its not clear if/why the load_data syntax is relevant here. Then 
for the `not_supports_load_dialects` I think we can skip verifying the parser 
error on other dialects, since by definition they don't support the syntax so 
its not super important



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to