alamb opened a new pull request, #14134:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14134

   Draft it is based on https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14083 from 
@mnpw
   
   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   This is a follow up to 
   - https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14083
   
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   We are trying to make sure `datafusion-physical-optimizers` are not 
dependent on the actual function implementations so ensuring the crate doesn't 
have dependency will let the compiler ensure this
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   Remove the dependency
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to