berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #14919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14919#discussion_r1974940700
##########
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##########
@@ -3346,3 +3351,62 @@ async fn
test_window_partial_constant_and_set_monotonicity() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
+
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_preserve_needed_coalesce() -> Result<()> {
+ // Input to EnforceSorting, from our test case.
+ let plan = projection_exec_with_alias(
+ union_exec(vec![parquet_exec_with_stats(); 2]),
+ vec![
+ ("a".to_string(), "a".to_string()),
+ ("b".to_string(), "value".to_string()),
+ ],
+ );
+ let plan = Arc::new(CoalescePartitionsExec::new(plan));
+ let schema = schema();
+ let sort_key = LexOrdering::new(vec![PhysicalSortExpr {
+ expr: col("a", &schema).unwrap(),
+ options: SortOptions::default(),
+ }]);
+ let plan: Arc<dyn ExecutionPlan> =
+ single_partitioned_aggregate(plan, vec![("a".to_string(),
"a1".to_string())]);
+ let plan = sort_exec(sort_key, plan);
+
+ // Starting plan: as in our test case.
+ assert_eq!(
+ get_plan_string(&plan),
+ vec![
+ "SortExec: expr=[a@0 ASC], preserve_partitioning=[false]",
+ " AggregateExec: mode=SinglePartitioned, gby=[a@0 as a1],
aggr=[]",
Review Comment:
Did you intentionally put `SinglePartitioned` aggregate mode? The input is
only 1 partition, so why don't you use AggregateMode::Single? I'm unsure if
this is a valid case @wiedld @alamb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
