andygrove commented on PR #71:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/71#issuecomment-2692805137

   > Thank you @andygrove !
   > 
   > A few suggestions:
   > 
   >     * Can we call `Greedy`, `Streaming`?   I think its more communicative 
about how it functions and conveys its major feature in the name.
   > 
   >     * for the code snippet, I think it should read:
   >       ```python
   >       import ray
   >       from datafusion_ray import DFRayContext
   >       
   >       ray.init()
   >       session = DFRayContext()
   >       df = session.sql("SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE value > 100")
   >       df.show()
   >       ```
   > 
   >     * I'm not sure about the trade offs as written.   I think its possible 
that, depending on the query,  a batch mode could be faster than a streaming 
mode for smaller queries due to less overhead.  We'll have to implement the 
batch mode to define this more clearly.
   > 
   >     * We should indicate that the batch mode is planned for `0.2.0` and 
`0.1.0` will include Streaming only
   
   I made the following updates:
   
   - Use Streaming and Batch terminology
   - Added note that batch is not implemented yet, with link to the tracking 
issue
   - Updated code example
   
   Do you have specific suggestions for updating the trade-offs?
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to