Omega359 commented on code in PR #15341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15341#discussion_r2007786253
##########
datafusion/expr-common/src/type_coercion/binary.rs:
##########
@@ -855,21 +855,14 @@ pub fn binary_numeric_coercion(
(UInt64, _) | (_, UInt64) => Some(UInt64),
(Int64, _)
| (_, Int64)
- | (UInt32, Int8)
- | (Int8, UInt32)
- | (UInt32, Int16)
- | (Int16, UInt32)
- | (UInt32, Int32)
- | (Int32, UInt32) => Some(Int64),
Review Comment:
1 - no, it's a refactor to match the other function. A better refactor I
suppose would be to extract that into it's own function and eliminate the
duplicated code.
2 - correct.
Yes, I think that is a reason thing to do. I'll try and do that today once
I'm done hacking async into a UDF I'm working on. I'm hoping #6518 is completed
soonish :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
