logan-keede opened a new issue, #15360: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15360
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? DataFusion has many dependencies that leads to increased binary size and compilation while saving us the trouble of maintaining those implementations in our own codebase. ### Describe the solution you'd like This issue is to Identify any crate/dependency `shallow` and `stable` enough to justify having an In-house implementation. 'shallow': We do not use much of the original crate. i.e we just use a small part that can be implemented in house without having to implement/port a massive dependency tree that crate has. The shallower the dependency, the more beneficial an in-house implementation would be. 'stable': The code is mostly stable and will not require much active changes after having an In-house implementation. (While all code eventually requires some changes, it is about how frequently and disruptively it will give us a headache.) ### Describe alternatives you've considered Do not have any in-house implementation. Pay the price of increased binary size and compile time. ### Additional context _Originally suggested by @ozankabak while discussing my GSoC 2025 Proposal for "Optimizing compile time and binary size" over discord and before that in #14478._ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
