NGA-TRAN commented on code in PR #16858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16858#discussion_r2229020034


##########
datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs:
##########
@@ -1358,6 +1358,9 @@ impl DefaultPhysicalPlanner {
                     physical_name(expr),
                 ))?])),
             }
+        } else if group_expr.is_empty() {
+            // No GROUP BY clause - create empty PhysicalGroupBy
+            Ok(PhysicalGroupBy::new(vec![], vec![], vec![]))

Review Comment:
   @alamb : I had a look. This would be very challenging and a lot of changes 
needed in physical plan, logical plan, parsing logic, 
serialization/deserialization. I do not think we want to make a big change just 
for this



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to