On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jason Riedy <[email protected]> wrote: > > And Yuri Takhteyev writes: >> "the Content is not spam, is not machine- or randomly-generated" > > Has there been any progress on this? Some portions of LAPACK have > been machine-generated, as have many other projects. I know > laconi.ca uses typical PHP code generators for deriving database > access routines. And users of QT may include code generated by GUI > layout tools. > > I finally made time to read the new ToS, and I cannot agree to them > so long as you ban all machine-generated content. Will this be > changed? If not, you will have to remove LAPACK and the XBLAS at > the very least, and likely many other projects.
Technically any Rails projects (gitorious included) violates this, although I'm sure that is not the intent of this term. It's a shame that we live in a world where "don't be evil" has to be spelled out in such detail. --Bill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gitorious" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gitorious?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
