Hi, On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Jason Riedy <[email protected]> wrote: > > And Yuri Takhteyev writes: >> "the Content is not spam, is not machine- or randomly-generated" > > Has there been any progress on this? Some portions of LAPACK have > been machine-generated, as have many other projects. I know > laconi.ca uses typical PHP code generators for deriving database > access routines. And users of QT may include code generated by GUI > layout tools.
We have narrowed down the scope a bit here to better convey the intent behind it, the TOS now say: "is not machine- or randomly-generated with malicious intent towards the Website". This effectively excludes your uploaded source code (which may be machine generated), bit disallows things like automated scripts generating garbage projects, accounts and so forth. > I finally made time to read the new ToS, and I cannot agree to them > so long as you ban all machine-generated content. Will this be > changed? If not, you will have to remove LAPACK and the XBLAS at > the very least, and likely many other projects. Does the clause sound more reasonable to you now? And just to make it absolutely clear, we have no intent of locking anyone down or excluding posting of code-generated code in your git repositories. We expect you to not be evil (and neither are we) and we want our TOS to reflect that while still covering us from abuse and the other points the TOS covers. > Jason Regards, Johan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gitorious" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gitorious?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
