On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:08 PM, hyc <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm surprised this was passed over so lightly. The text that Yuri > quoted from the Terms of Service means that users grant gitorious a > sublicense to the content. And yet, most of the free software licenses > prohibit sublicensing. This is a pretty glaring conflict, given the > huge amount of GPL code present on gitorious. E.g., GPLv3 states this > explicitly at the end of Section 2. > Sublicensing is not allowed; section 10 makes it unnecessary. > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
So is the issue here the text "(hereunder sub-licensing)", or are there other issues you're concerned about? Cheers, - Marius -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
