On Mar 23, 1:18 am, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:08 PM, hyc <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm surprised this was passed over so lightly. The text that Yuri > > quoted from the Terms of Service means that users grant gitorious a > > sublicense to the content. And yet, most of the free software licenses > > prohibit sublicensing. This is a pretty glaring conflict, given the > > huge amount of GPL code present on gitorious. E.g., GPLv3 states this > > explicitly at the end of Section 2. > > Sublicensing is not allowed; section 10 makes it unnecessary. > >http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html > > So is the issue here the text "(hereunder sub-licensing)", or are there > other issues you're concerned about? > Sub-licensing, exactly.
-- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
