On Mar 27, 2010, at 6:10 PM, Pieter de Bie wrote: > This feels a bit icky to me. Isn't there a more solid way to do this? > take git-svn's default behaviour for example, which creates a single > branch refs/remotes/git-svn
... > I think this also fails with git-svn's refs/remotes/git-svn branch I don't use git-svn, so a few questions: Is there always only one svn remote in a repo? Is there any way to tell if any given ref is the/an svn remote? Does GitX need to disable functions (like merge) when there's an svn remote in the repo? Can we move full git-svn support to 0.8.1? --Nathan http://brotherbard.com/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gitx+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
