This does look really good. Nathan - any reason not to merge this branch down to master and clean it up for release? Is there another branch that would be better?
-dave On May 12, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Gerd Knops wrote: > > On May 12, 2010, at 4:08 AM, StuFF mc wrote: > >> Guys, >> >> I'm new to the list and I actually discovered brotherbard's fork only >> about 2 weeks ago. I really (but really) don't understand why: >> >> - It's called experimental... It just works perfectly >> - One would go with the feature set of the "stable" branch >> >> Why don't you guys merge with this branch? It definetely deserves the >> name "1.0", from my point of view (no pun intended to all the other >> branches out there). > > Indeed a nice looking branch. > > Things I personally miss or would like to change: > > - Get rid of the initial open panel. Optionally instead provide the "Recent" > repositories as a list, with "Other" as a choice to bring up the open panel. > Or at least fix the bug where the open panel defaults to the last repository > opened using the open panel rather than the last repository opened period (eg > by dismissing the open panel and using the Recent menu). > > - Add the "short" sha in the table > > - Make the search default to all fields in the table > > A long time ago I provided patches for the last two features, but they have > gone lost I guess. > > Gerd >
