Martijn van Beers wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 10:39:40AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 02:48:52PM +0100, Martijn van Beers wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 06:13:50PM +0000, Damon Chaplin wrote: > > > > Martijn van Beers wrote: > > > > > Yes, that's my aim. As Daniel Veillard said it, elements are to define > > > > > structure, and the structure should be as close to gtk+'s structure > > > > > as possible > > > > I'm not sure its a good idea to complete change the XML format now. > > > > Maybe if there are big advantages, but I'm not sure using attributes for > > > > properties gains us much. > > > I'll let Daniel Veillard comment on the exact advantages of using > > > attributes, since he's the expert. > > Then looking at those hints, I was thinking it would make sense > > to try to keep the structure close to the actual widget tree. Whether > [...] > > So keep up the good work and if a format redesign is needed, > > then the sooner the better ! > > So, do I continue my work on the DTD, or will it never be used anyway? If you can convince us that there are major benefits from using XML attributes for properties. If we switch to that we'll have to figure out how to update all existing .glade files and also update all apps which parse the current XML format. So personally I'm not in favour of it at present. Damon +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.
