Hello, Ishan has asked me to work with him and I think later we might implemented some of his unfinished ideas or more togehter. I was using MSVC but I can't see any obvious difficulty in compling my port with mingw. Let me try.
With Rgrds, Ivan Wong. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damon Chaplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dragon Master" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 01:11 Subject: Re: [Glade-devel] Win32 port of Glade 2.0.1 > On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 20:21, Dragon Master wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Ivan Wong wrote: > > > > > Hello. > > > I have ported 2.0.1 to win32 with a few platform specified problems fixed. > > > It may be still buggy, but it seems OK for my daily use. You can find it > > > here: > > > http://gladewin32.sourceforge.net > > > > Woohoo, yet a third win32 port author. Damon, have you ever considered > > picking one of us poor sods and integrating our patches into CVS? Then we > > could put a stop to this endless proliferation of port patches. It's part > > of the Embrace and Extend tactic GTK+ is using. We Embrace Windows, then > > we give them a widget set that's better than MFC, and then lots of Windows > > programs start using it, and then Microsoft goes bankrupt and is sold off > > in chunks to the highest bidder. <cough> Ok, skipped a few steps there, > > but you get the idea. :) > > I did apply some patches from Ishan before the last release, 2.0.1. > > If you 3 can come up with some definitive patches for win32 support that > would be great. > > It's a bit awkward for me as I don't have all the win32 stuff installed > to test it. Do you all use the same tools, e.g. mingw? > > Damon > > > _______________________________________________ > Glade-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel > _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
