> 0 - You don't have enough bandwidth on your personal computer UploadWirzard supports uploadbyurl, but it is only enabled for licenser and admins because upload by url is not 100% stable. GWToolset has bugs too.
> 3 - Before making massive uploads, people want to try it *with the real > tool* (GLAMs too). We have the betacluster (http://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/) to test. It is a real clone. Per request (mailinglist/talkpage/mail) i can grant the gwtoolset right to trusted user without bureaucracy on the betacluster. Regards, > Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:19:50 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Glamtools] Open GWT to all Commons users > > On 27.04.2014 18:39, Steinsplitter Wiki wrote: > > We have changed from admin to cratmanegment for a good reason (GWT is > > powerful tool like botflag). > > > > 10 per XML sounds like nonsense. The user can use UploadWirzard... > > Here are a few reasons why it makes sense and why the uploadWizard is > not adapted in some cases: > 0 - You don't have enough bandwidth on your personal computer > 1 - You don't have the data on your computer > 2 - You already have the metadata in a structured way > 3 - Before making massive uploads, people want to try it *with the real > tool* (GLAMs too). > > But, you make a point, maybe 10 is too low or we should remove this kind > of limit and just rely on the upload speed. Anyway, this was just a > starter proposition. > > Emmanuel > > -- > Volunteer > Technology, GLAM, Trainings > Zurich > +41 797 670 398 > > _______________________________________________ > Glamtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
_______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
