> open to all > ----------- @dan: So eine Änderung wird nicht duch's codereview kommen (community-consensus-needed@shellpolicy). Bevor ihr an den Rechteconfigs aufschraubt bitte RFC.
> From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:29:31 +0200 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Glamtools] Open GWT to all Commons users > > open to all > ----------- > my main concern in regards to opening the tool to everyone is whether or not > bad up loaders could be dealt with quickly enough. > > > too many uploads at once > ------------------------ > there are already “throttles” in place that limit the amount of files that > can be uploaded at once and per background job run and the total number of > GWToolset uploads that can exist in the job queue at once: > > • > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:GWToolset/Technical_Design#Throttles.2C_Limits.2C_Delays > • > http://git.wikimedia.org/blob/mediawiki%2Fextensions%2FGWToolset.git/306957ce40aa803b24f50230107751f407950c91/includes%2FConfig.php > > thus far i don’t think we’ve run into issues with those limit. > > > big upload issue > ---------------- > as far as i currently understand the issue, the problem was not that > GWToolset uploaded too many images; the problem was that the tool that > generates thumbnails tried to create too many thumbnails at once. if that’s > true, then it seems to me that the tool that takes care of that should have > it’s own throttle and job queue so that it doesn’t try to create too many > thumbnails at once. > > > with kind regards, > dan > > > On Apr 27, 2014, at 19:33 , Steinsplitter Wiki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > 0 - You don't have enough bandwidth on your personal computer > > UploadWirzard supports uploadbyurl, but it is only enabled for licenser and > > admins because upload by url is not 100% stable. > > GWToolset has bugs too. > > > > > 3 - Before making massive uploads, people want to try it *with the real > > > tool* (GLAMs too). > > We have the betacluster (http://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/) to > > test. It is a real clone. > > Per request (mailinglist/talkpage/mail) i can grant the gwtoolset right to > > trusted user without bureaucracy on the betacluster. > > > > Regards, > > > > > Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:19:50 +0200 > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Glamtools] Open GWT to all Commons users > > > > > > On 27.04.2014 18:39, Steinsplitter Wiki wrote: > > > > We have changed from admin to cratmanegment for a good reason (GWT is > > > > powerful tool like botflag). > > > > > > > > 10 per XML sounds like nonsense. The user can use UploadWirzard... > > > > > > Here are a few reasons why it makes sense and why the uploadWizard is > > > not adapted in some cases: > > > 0 - You don't have enough bandwidth on your personal computer > > > 1 - You don't have the data on your computer > > > 2 - You already have the metadata in a structured way > > > 3 - Before making massive uploads, people want to try it *with the real > > > tool* (GLAMs too). > > > > > > But, you make a point, maybe 10 is too low or we should remove this kind > > > of limit and just rely on the upload speed. Anyway, this was just a > > > starter proposition. > > > > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > -- > > > Volunteer > > > Technology, GLAM, Trainings > > > Zurich > > > +41 797 670 398 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Glamtools mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools > > _______________________________________________ > > Glamtools mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools > > > _______________________________________________ > Glamtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
_______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
