GWToolset ignores the SHA-1 duplication warning. as far as i remember, the intent is to make sure the source of the mediafile and metadata is from the GLAM.
with kind regards, dan On May 3, 2014, at 09:36 , Fæ <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/05/2014, Brian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote: >> On May 2, 2014 5:40 AM, "Fæ" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I have had many issues around this in the past. If the images are the >> same in quality/resolution then avoid duplicating what is currently on >> Commons. However if your versions are, in your view, better quality then >> there is no problem uploading them as they are not true duplicates. >> Digitally identical duplicates should be rejected automatically at upload >> as the files have matching SHA-1 checks. >> >> Thats from normal upload. Gwtoolset may be different. Anyways they can be >> dealt with after the fact too if they are exactly identical as its easy to >> detect later. > > Just to clarify, does the GWT ignore the SHA-1 based duplicate warning > and upload the digitally identical duplicate as a new file? > > If it does, rather than skipping it or giving a warning, then this > seems like a bug. > > Fae > -- > [email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > _______________________________________________ > Glamtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools _______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
