#1241: Functional dependency Coverage Condition is lifted, and should not be
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: guest | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8
Component: Compiler (Type checker) | Version: 6.6
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Difficulty: Unknown
Testcase: | Architecture: Unknown
Os: Unknown |
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by guest):
Hello,
would it be too much trouble to use the "dependency" instead of the
"coverage" condition when type-checking with {{{-fallow-undecidable-
instances}}}? As far as I recall, the main issue with the dependency
condition was that it could lead to non-termination in the type-checker
but that is to be expected with {{{-fallow-undecidable-instances}}}
anyways.
-Iavor
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1241>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
