Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... > > > (HDirect doesn't currently allow you to map enums to newtypes of Int > > (say), but it could. No big deal). > > Hmm, IMHO it's not enum that should be mapped to newtype but a simple > typedef: Enums have a certain bounded set of possible values while > something like 'typedef unsigned long off_t' has not (at least > conceptually). I consider the automatic wrapping/unwrapping into > newtypes as a crucial feature of any kind of type-safe IDL, so it > should definitely included into H/Direct. > That's a different issue; you can use 'interface {}' decls to achieve this kind of type safety. --sigbjorn
- Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Frank A. Christoph
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty