"Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, [...] > Having a .h -> .idl route would be helpful (at least until .idl has > supplanted the use .h as a means to specify libs ;-), but I'm probably > not going to invest any more time developing HDirect (or GreenCard), > so if anyone feels the itch, go for it! Oh, really? That's bad news, I guess. What will be your new "project"? Manuel
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty