>The problem is that if you are reading single bytes, 233 is
>not necessarily é.
Erm, Internationalisation is not my thin as such... but I can't help
commenting that from a systems point of view this is an utterly bad
sitiation to be in... I though Haskell used unicode? I thought in unicode
the id of a character was fixed irrespective of language. Where is
unicode support lacking?
Regards,
Keean Schupke.
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
