Simon Marlow wrote:
> Here is what I propose to do regarding the libraries we ship with GHC
> 6.6. Comments are appreciated, since we need to finalise this story
> before the release candidate at the end of this week.
>
I have a small comment...
> So here's what I propose:
>
> - A "GHC source tree" will contain a core set of packages. This is
> what you will get if you download ghc-6.6-src.tar.bz2, or do
> "sh darcs-all get" in a darcs repo. The core packages are:
>
> base, haskell98, template-haskell, readline, stm, Cabal, unix,
Win32
> plus hopefully regex-base and regex-posix if I integrate them this
> week. These are the packages required to bootstrap GHC, or those
> with deep GHC dependencies (template-haskell & stm).
>
You will also want regex-compat if you want to keep the old Text.Regex module
API. (Renaming Text.Regex.New to Text.Regex)
I have just gone over the stable repository [1] for regex-base,posix,compat and
tweaked the cabal files to better match the packages they actually depend upon.
The latest version of these is now 0.71
But I suspect you don't use cabal to build these for GHC.
The posix c library is slow, but at least it is what people have been using.
Note that Text.Regex.New from regex-compat is so close to Text.Regex that it
shares the same "bugs", such as splitting or substituting with a pattern that
matches an empty string and going into an infinite loop.
Should I sacrifice a little backwards compatibility and catch these "bugs"?
--
Chris
[1] http://evenmere.org/~chrisk/trl/stable/
[2] http://evenmere.org/~chrisk/trl/head/
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
