On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > > The libraries question is a difficult one. We have made a lot of > effort over the last 5 years to build infrastructure and code that is > shared and portable across multiple implementations of the language. > Is this the time to fork those supposedly "common" core libraries into > ghc versions vs the rest?
I think the non-GHC implementations have been struggling for development time as it is. As you say, we've been trying to increase the amount of shared code, to reduce the burden on them. I think forking the bootlibs would represent a huge step the other way, and, as you said later in your e-mail, may be what finally kills them off. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
