On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:12 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:12:20AM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > > > > Moreover, as I wrote a few times before, some reasons for switching in > > the first place are invalidated by not having the core libraries in > > git, too. For example, one complaint about darcs is that it either > > doesn't build (on the Sun Solaris T1 and T2 machines) > > I don't remember seeing this mentioned before, and googling for > "Solaris T1" darcs > doesn't find anything.
That's probably because there entire world are probably only two T1/T2 machines that people are using to run ghc. :-) One of them is at UNSW and the other was recently donated by Sun to the community and is just about to go online at Chalmers. > What goes wrong? I'd expect darcs to build anywhere GHC does. So would I usually, though I've had to turn down cc flags to get darcs to build on ia64 before (SHA1.hs generates enormous register pressure). Duncan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
