2009/7/16 Kazu Yamamoto <k...@iij.ad.jp> > Hello, > > > I have a standalone (i.e. not integrated into the RTS yet) proof of > concept > > working using kqueue. However, to be portable we still need to fall back > to > > select on systems that don't support anything better. This implies that > if you > > want to write portable code you still suffer from this limit. > > If portability is important, how about falling back to poll(), not > epoll()? >
We could provide poll as a possible backend but I don't think it's available on Windows. -- Johan
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
