On Jul 16, 2009, at 03:32 , Johan Tibell wrote:
2009/7/16 Kazu Yamamoto <k...@iij.ad.jp>> I have a standalone (i.e. not integrated into the RTS yet) proof of concept > working using kqueue. However, to be portable we still need to fall back to > select on systems that don't support anything better. This implies that if you> want to write portable code you still suffer from this limit.If portability is important, how about falling back to poll(), not epoll()?We could provide poll as a possible backend but I don't think it's available on Windows.
http://plibc.sourceforge.net/ ? -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
