2010/2/2 Isaac Dupree <m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org>: > I'm concerned in both your proposals, that single-letter names like "t" and > "d" are common function parameters, thus possibly producing > - shadowing warnings for all such functions in modules that happen to use TH > - errors, I think, for some uses of TH inside such functions (either the > function parameters must be renamed, or the TH splice module-qualified)
Yes, this is certainly an annoyance :-). However, we didn't have backcompat high up the list of priorities with these proposals - instead we wanted to look at how TH and QQ might be redesigned to work together a bit more neatly if we were starting with a clean slate today. You can of course choose more expressive names than "e" and "t" if you're going to break backcompat anyway, Cheers, Max _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
