On Feb 3, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
2010/2/2 Twan van Laarhoven <twa...@gmail.com>:class Quoted a where parseQuote :: String -> a -- for performance reasons: parseQuote' :: Ghc.PackedString -> aGreat idea! Thinking about it, you can use type classes to dispose of the QuasiQuote record entirely. Instead, have: class MyLang a where myLang :: String -> Q a instance MyLang Exp where myLang = myLangSyntaxToGHCExprForSplice . myLangExpParser ... etc, MyLang instances for Pat and Type too ...
With a class-based approach only one parser that creates values of the same type could be used in a program. It would not be possible to embed multiple languages that create TH.Exp to be spliced into a single program. With the current syntax, I can write [$myLang| ... |] and [$yourLang| ... |] in the same program and use different parsers although both create Exp values.
And then write: $(myLang [|...|])
This is more verbose than the proposed [myLang| ... |]. There seem to be different goals in the different proposals in this thread: 1. Simplify the syntax for quasi quoting (remove $, use different brackets), 2. make it more generally applicable (allow declarations and/or types to be quasi quoted), and 3. simplify and generalise its implementation (invent a single mechanism that unifies quasi quoting and TH splicing).
Sebastian -- Underestimating the novelty of the future is a time-honored tradition. (D.G.) _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
