On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Max Bolingbroke <batterseapo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Naturally other workflows are possible and I'm sure other list members > will chime in with their own favourites :-)
Here's the flow I use: http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ with the exception of having the master branch be the development branch, which is what most Git users expect. > Ultimately I'm quite concerned with keeping GHC HQ happy (as you guys > do the lions share of the work!). I feel we should only make the > switch if the most frequent committers (i.e. Simon, Simon and Ian) are > *totally happy* with it and any associated workflow changes that may > be required. I agree with this sentiment. If GHC HQ believes Git will make their job harder, I'm not in favor of a switch. (From personal experience I think it will make it easier after an initial short learning curve, but I cannot know this for certain of course.) Johan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
