So the basic point seems to be: "if you know how to use a tool, you don't usually curse and swear when you use it. If you don't, you tend to swear a lot!"
:) On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Adam Wick <aw...@galois.com> wrote: > On 01/10/2011 08:52 AM, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > >> If I were considering contributing minor patches to a project, the use of >> git would probably not deter me too much - I can cope with the simple stuff. >> But if I wanted more major involvement, git would definitely cause me to >> think twice about whether to bother. >> > > And just to show that you can't make everyone happy ... I'll put in an > equal-and-opposite vote from Malcolm. GHC's use of darcs is a blocker for > me even thinking about doing any work on GHC or the related libraries; my > limited experience with darcs has been terrible, and the swearing I've heard > about darcs makes me think my experience was not unique. Switching to git > would make the chance that I'd do work on GHC nonzero. > > > - Adam > > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users > >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
