On 10/02/2012, at 23:30, John Meacham wrote:
> something I have thought about is perhaps a special syntax for Proxy, like
> {:: Int -> Int } is short for (Proxy :: Proxy (Int -> Int)). not sure whether
> that is useful enough in practice though, but could be handy if we are
> throwing
> around types a lot.
We really need explicit syntax for type application. There are already a lot of
cases where we have to work around not having it (e.g., Storable) and with the
new extensions, there are going to be more and more of those.
Roman
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
