On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Johan Tibell <[email protected]>wrote:
> Thanks for sharing! My perspective is of course as a user. I don't think
> I've ever run into a case where the compiler broken a previous work e.g.
> C++ program. On the other hand I have to make a release of most of the
> libraries I maintain with every GHC release (to bump cabal version
> constraints to accept the new base version, if nothing else).
>
gcc has had its moments occasionally, although usually major gcc issues
aren't called by gcc itself but by packagers ("gcc 2.96", anyone?) or fugly
politics (egcs).
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
[email protected] [email protected]
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
