Somebody claiming to be Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
* Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com> [2013-02-13 09:00:15+0000]
It's feasible to split base, but to a first approximation what you
end up with is base renamed to ghc-base, and then the new base
contains just stub modules that re-export stuff from ghc-base.

It would be great to have a portable base, without any GHC-specific
stuff in it. After all, modules like Control.Monad or Data.Foldable are
pure Haskell2010.

+1

--
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to