Hi, > On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:11, Joachim Breitner <m...@joachim-breitner.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2014, 11:08 +0000 schrieb Alain O'Dea: >> From what I understand Travis CI limits running time for each build. >> We may be able to create binaries of stage1 and/or stage2 in one build >> and test them in another. We could also fan out the test process >> using a Build Matrix to let GHC's full suite fit into the time limit >> as fragments. That would require some changes to the testsuite or >> some lengthy build scripts for each segment that explicitly run many >> "make TEST=sometest" commands. > > The main problem with Travis is that it only tests on one architecture. > There are more (e.g. very undetailed reporting compared to a buildbot > waterfall/grid)
Good points. > Hence: Travis is _not_ going to be a solution for us; we will want our > own infrastructure. I'm happy to assist with getting whatever system fits the bill working. It seems like Buildbot should. Where can we get infrastructure on multiple architectures easily? I imagine we may need to mix and match. > Greetings, > Joachim > > -- > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner > m...@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ > Jabber: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C > Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users