I'm going to read up on Ian's Buildbot work and experiment with that in the meantime. If other challenges come up I'm glad to dive in and help.
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 12:03, Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Indeed, there is no reason not to use Ian et al's Builder stuff. It's one of > the options. But it depends on a critical evaluation of what the advantages > and disadvantages of different approaches are > > Simon > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- > | [email protected]] On Behalf Of Karel Gardas > | Sent: 01 April 2014 12:46 > | To: Joachim Breitner; [email protected]; Páli Gábor János > | Cc: [email protected] > | Subject: Re: Buildbots > | > | > | Hi, > | > | I'm curious why not to use what's already written by Ian and others and > | which is currently running again? E.g. Janos Gabor Pali was so nice to > | start and keep builder server running on > | http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/builders/ > | > | Just few are there, but others may be added. Just send email to Janos to > | get the credentials and more information about what to get from where > | (recent builder client is needed). > | > | Perhaps we shall more advertise this option on GHC's builder wiki page? > | > | Thanks, > | Karel > | > | > | On 04/ 1/14 01:11 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > | > Hence: Travis is _not_ going to be a solution for us; we will want our > | > own infrastructure. > | _______________________________________________ > | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > | [email protected] > | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
