Either way, do we have a strong agreement that for ghc 8.2 that this warning should be split up and the noiser part should be moved out of the default wall set?
On Monday, June 6, 2016, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote: > To better elaborate : I definitely want this for the next major version > i.e. 8.2.* , but I'm also wondering if perhaps the "overly constrained > type" warning should be flat out removed from Wall even in ghc 8.0.2, > > On Monday, June 6, 2016, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonw...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carter.schonw...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> It's a tall ask, but why not? >> On Jun 6, 2016 12:16 PM, "Eric Seidel" <e...@seidel.io> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016, at 07:37, Carter Schonwald wrote: >>> > I don't suppose there's any hope of having this resolved prior to GHC >>> 8.2 >>> > because it is a real usability regression? Because I think we can all >>> > agree >>> > that the proposed change would not break any 8.0 series code, and >>> > positively impact everyone. >>> >>> Do you mean prior to 8.0.2? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list >>> Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org >>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
