I don't have any personal experience with the new warning, but it does sound to me like there are two separate warnings (redundant vs unused constraints) combined under a single flag. So I would support separating them!
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 09:38, Carter Schonwald wrote: > Either way, do we have a strong agreement that for ghc 8.2 that this > warning should be split up and the noiser part should be moved out of the > default wall set? > > On Monday, June 6, 2016, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > To better elaborate : I definitely want this for the next major version > > i.e. 8.2.* , but I'm also wondering if perhaps the "overly constrained > > type" warning should be flat out removed from Wall even in ghc 8.0.2, > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2016, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonw...@gmail.com > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carter.schonw...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > > >> It's a tall ask, but why not? > >> On Jun 6, 2016 12:16 PM, "Eric Seidel" <e...@seidel.io> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016, at 07:37, Carter Schonwald wrote: > >>> > I don't suppose there's any hope of having this resolved prior to GHC > >>> 8.2 > >>> > because it is a real usability regression? Because I think we can all > >>> > agree > >>> > that the proposed change would not break any 8.0 series code, and > >>> > positively impact everyone. > >>> > >>> Do you mean prior to 8.0.2? > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > >>> Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > >>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
