that matches my experience, namely that i've successfully installed ghc 9.2.2 on osx 12.4 aka monterey a few times
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:59 PM George Colpitts <george.colpi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ben > > Thanks for the quick responses particularly on the weekend before your > vacation. > > you wrote: > > What happens > if you try to install to do something like (in the extracted binary > distribution), > > > $ ./configure --prefix=`pwd`/tmp > $ make install # this will fail > $ xattr -rc . > $ make install # perhaps this will finish successfully? > # tmp/bin/ghc --version # GHC should be usable > > > success on both my machines using a slightly modified version of your > suggestion above for 21506: > > ./configure --prefix=`pwd`/tmp # specifying ./tmp seems to be critical > > xattr -rc . # seems to be necessary > also > > sudo make install # seems to works , output ends > with "recache" > > ./tmp/bin/ghc --version # success , although admittedly > the smallest smoke test possible > > You wrote: > > > > Ultimately I think we may just need to bite the bullet and start > properly notarising/codesigning releases (resolving #17418). At this point > we have > spent more time trying to avoid the notarisation requirement than > it would likely take to satisfy it. Unfortunately, this will require > that I find an Apple device somewhere which may take a few weeks. > > > I'm afraid I am on holiday next week but I would quite grateful if we > could arrange for a chat after I return such that we can debug this in > realtime. > > > Sure, we can chat when you return from your vacation. > > Not sure if it is worth trying to fix the release on the basis of what I > write above. My opinion is: it is if we can get reports of at least one > other person having this issue. I am fine with not doing this for 9.4.1 > > I agree that we should raise the priority of "notarising/codesigning > releases (resolving #17418)". My opinion is that it is not worth delaying > 9.4.1 for this. > > Have a great vacation. > > Cheers > George > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 11:33 AM Ben Gamari <b...@well-typed.com> wrote: > >> George Colpitts <george.colpi...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > +Kazu Yamamoto <k...@iij.ad.jp> >> > >> > Hi Ben >> > >> > My 2 machines also have: >> > >> > $ spctl --status >> > assessments enabled >> > >> Hmm, interesting. Then I am truly perplexed. >> >> > Speculations: >> > >> > >> /usr/local/lib/ghc-9.4.0.20220721/bin/../lib/x86_64-osx-ghc-9.4.0.20220721/libHSterminfo-0.4.1.5-ghc9.4.0.20220721.dylib >> > is created after xattr -rc . was run so it doesn't have the necessary >> > attributes. Is it possible that ghc developers and/or the test machines >> > have this file on another of the paths in the error message and that is >> why >> > it works for them? >> > >> I'm not sure where this would be but at this point anything is possible. >> What happens >> if you try to install to do something like (in the extracted binary >> distribution), >> >> $ ./configure --prefix=`pwd`/tmp >> $ make install # this will fail >> $ xattr -rc . >> $ make install # perhaps this will finish successfully? >> # tmp/bin/ghc --version # GHC should be usable >> >> > I hope I didn't offend you by asking if the fix had been tested; I >> assume >> > it had been but I thought it was important to rule that out. >> > >> Not to worry; it's a very reasonable question to ask given the >> circumstances. >> >> > More than happy to test. I really appreciate all the work you and others >> > have put into GHC ! >> > >> Ultimately I think we may just need to bite the bullet and start >> properly notarising/codesigning releases (resolving #17418). At this >> point we have >> spent more time trying to avoid the notarisation requirement than >> it would likely take to satisfy it. Unfortunately, this will require >> that I find an Apple device somewhere which may take a few weeks. >> >> I'm afraid I am on holiday next week but I would quite grateful if we >> could arrange for a chat after I return such that we can debug this in >> realtime. >> >> Cheers, >> >> - Ben >> > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
